Taxpayers not carrying on an agistment business

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (‘AAT’) has held that two taxpayers were not carrying on a business of providing services to a company (which they owned) and consequently were not entitled to various deductions.

The taxpayers had claimed those deductions on the basis that they were carrying on a business of providing agistment and full care animal husbandry and veterinary services to their company.

The AAT concluded that, on balance, the agistment arrangements did not constitute a ‘business’.

The AAT noted in this regard that there was a degree of systematic, business-like behaviour. However, the AAT was of the view that the absence of a profit-making purpose, the uncommercial nature of the transactions and similar considerations nevertheless led to the conclusion that a business was not being carried on.

DO YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS BLOG TOPIC?

CALL (08) 9248 8124 NOW OR SIMPLY FILL IN THE FORM BELOW

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Posted in

Related

Warren Kruger

Specialist Tax Consultant - “Helping YOU Pay The Correct Tax And Not A Penny More”. My story starts on Christmas Eve, back in 1983 in South Africa.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Need Help With

Your Tax Return?

Complete the form below for a fast response

Scroll to Top
Call Now Button